IMC 2011: Sessions
Session 514: Relativity of Poverty in Urban and Rural Milieu as Reflected in Late Medieval Sources: Examples from Dalmatia-Croatia and Slavonia
Tuesday 12 July 2011, 09.00-10.30
Sponsor: | Institute of Historical & Social Sciences, Croatian Academy of Sciences & Arts, Zagreb |
---|---|
Organiser: | Damir Karbić, Institute of Historical & Social Sciences, Croatian Academy of Sciences & Arts, Zagreb |
Moderator/Chair: | Gerhard Jaritz, Institut für Realienkunde, Universität Salzburg, Krems / Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest |
Paper 514-a | Spectrum of Wealth and Poverty as Reflected in the 14th- and 15th-Century Inventories and Notarial Records of Urban and Rural Population of Zadar and Šibenik (Language: English) Index terms: Charters and Diplomatics, Daily Life, Mentalities, Social History |
Paper 514-b | Poor and Rich in Slavonian Towns and Surrounding Noble Communities as Reflected in Their Records: The Examples of Zagreb and Turopolje (Language: English) Index terms: Charters and Diplomatics, Daily Life, Economics - Urban, Social History |
Paper 514-c | Relativity of Poverty and Wealth of Aristocracy and Lesser Nobility in Southern Slavonia as Reflected in Records of Places of Authentication and Royal Charters (Language: English) Index terms: Charters and Diplomatics, Daily Life, Politics and Diplomacy, Social History |
Paper 514-d | Poverty and Wealth in Theory and Practice as Reflected in the Works and Agency of Bishop Augustin Kazotic of Zagreb (the Early 14th Century) (Language: English) Index terms: Daily Life, Ecclesiastical History, Religious Life, Social History |
Abstract | The session discusses the manner in which different social milieus perceived poverty and wealth on the examples of three distinct types of communities: Mediterranean communes (Zadar and Šibenik), continental towns of German type (Zagreb), and different noble communities of the rural area (the counties of Southern Slavonia and the noble community of Turopolje). In all these communities, the poverty and wealth were measured against expectations characteristic for different social layers, and were consequently quite different for aristocracy and lesser nobility, commoners, burgers, and peasants. The extant sources reflect that relativity in a variety of aspects (material culture, status, and political participation, fiscal exemptions, etc.) which shall be presented. |