Skip to main content

IMC 2014: Sessions

Session 116: Staufen and Plantagenets: Two Empires in Comparison, I - Strategies of Ruling

Monday 7 July 2014, 11.15-12.45

Sponsor:Haskins Society
Organiser:Alheydis Plassmann, Institut für Geschichtswissenschaft, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Moderator/Chair:Matthew J. Strickland, School of Humanities (History), University of Glasgow
Paper 116-aWhat is an Empire?
(Language: English)
Stephen Church, School of History, University of East Anglia
Index terms: Administration, Political Thought
Paper 116-bCrossing the Alps and Crossing the Channel: Political Culture in the Hohenstaufen and the Angevin Empire
(Language: English)
Thomas Foerster, Det norske institutt i Roma, Universitetet i Oslo
Index terms: Administration, Political Thought
Paper 116-cMarrying an Heiress: Strategies of Appropriating Lordships Acquired by Marriage – The Case of Burgundy and Aquitaine
(Language: English)
Alheydis Plassmann, Institut für Geschichtswissenschaft, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Index terms: Administration, Charters and Diplomatics
Abstract

While the Staufen and the Plantagenets have long been of interest to German and English historians respectively, a comparative perspective has rarely been adopted. It would, however, allow for several new takes on seemingly familiar topics. The first session will focus on the notion of empire and the difficulties of ruling a vast 'Empire'. What strategies were adopted to handle the problems of ruling provinces far away or recently acquired? How did rulers deal with the fact, that people in different parts of the 'Empire' might have had different ideas about how law and lordship were to be managed?