IMC 2016: Sessions
Session 805: Global Byzantium: Transitional Relations, 500-1453, IV
Tuesday 5 July 2016, 16.30-18.00
Sponsor: | Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman & Modern Greek Studies, Department of Classics, Ancient History & Archaeology, University of Birmingham |
---|---|
Organiser: | Lauren A. Wainwright, Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman & Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham |
Moderator/Chair: | Rebecca Darley, Department of History, Classics & Archaeology, Birkbeck, University of London / Institute for Medieval Studies, University of Leeds |
Respondent: | Jonathan Jarrett, School of History, University of Leeds |
Paper 805-a | Coins, Conversions, and the Crimea: The Byzantine Northern Border Under Michael III (Language: English) Index terms: Byzantine Studies, Numismatics, Politics and Diplomacy |
Paper 805-b | Clerical Marriage and the 1054 Schism (Language: English) Index terms: Byzantine Studies, Canon Law, Religious Life |
Paper 805-c | A 'Neglected' Material: The Use of Stucco Decorations in Byzantine Buildings and Their Evidence in Written Sources (Language: English) Index terms: Archives and Sources, Art History - Sculpture, Byzantine Studies |
Abstract | This is the fourth of four related panels. Byzantine relations with the states and nations that encircled the empire are a familiar topic of discussion and debate. But Byzantium's geographical position and established political and economic networks meant that the empire was the central lynchpin for a complex and global web of transnational relationships as well. Byzantium linked the Vikings and Rus in the north; the Catholic lands of Europe and (after the mid-8th century) the Umayyad caliphate of al Andalus to the west; Abbasid and then Fatimid Egypt and the North African coast to the south (with tentacles reaching down the Nile to Ethiopia and through the Sahara to the Niger valley); and, to the east, Palestine, the caliphates of Damascus and then Baghdad, across the Sinai and Arabian peninsulas to the Indian Ocean and, along the so-called Silk Routes, China. These transnational relations manifested themselves in many ways, among others: economic links through trade routes; military and political links through conflict or diplomacy; and cultural links through the social mobility promoted by economic opportunity and transferrable expertise (the classic sub-field of transnational studies in contemporary history, which is however only part of the field as a whole). With a few notable exceptions, however, Byzantine transnational relations have been little discussed, and never compared. |