IMC 2019: Sessions

Session 702: Kings and Saints in Early Britain

Tuesday 2 July 2019, 14.15-15.45

Moderator/Chair:Chris Lewis, Institute of Historical Research, University of London / Department of History, King's College London
Paper 702-aThe Making of John of Beverley, a Yorkshire Saint
(Language: English)
Paulette Barton, Department of Modern Languages & Classics / Department of History, University of Maine
Paulette Barton, Department of Modern Languages & Classics / Department of History, University of Maine
Index terms: Ecclesiastical History, Hagiography, Local History, Religious Life
Paper 702-bUnderstanding the Trajectories of Royal Power in the Early Medieval Kingdoms of the Picts and Scots
(Language: English)
Nicholas Evans, Independent Scholar, Cottingham
Nicholas Evans, Independent Scholar, Cottingham
Index terms: Administration, Archaeology - Sites, Geography and Settlement Studies, Politics and Diplomacy
Paper 702-cLayered Kingship in Anglo-Saxon England
(Language: English)
Daniel Cutts, Department of History, University of Aberdeen
Daniel Cutts, Department of History, University of Aberdeen
Index terms: Anthropology, Archaeology - Sites, Historiography - Modern Scholarship, Onomastics
Abstract

Paper -a:
In this paper I will examine the material culture both of John’s life and post-life as it influenced the development of the cult of St John of Beverley. John died in 721 and his hagiography developed soon after and began the process of demonstrating his sainthood. Athelstan adds to John’s prominence with grants of land, sanctuary rights, and the foundation of a collegiate church in 934. John’s sainthood allowed the Minster and the town of Beverley to develop as a sanctuary and a place of pilgrimage. I will argue that John’s sainthood met a socio-cultural need that adapted to changing views of his sainthood.

Paper -b:
By the year 1000, the kingdom of the Scots was powerful, second in Britain only to that of the English. However, we do not really understand how this was achieved. As well as introducing Aberdeen University’s Comparative Kingship project, this paper will consider the evidence for early medieval Pictish overkingship and its successor kingdom of Alba (of the Scots). It will analyse potential explanations for change and will suggest how, by combining the investigation of textual sources, archaeology, environmental, landscape, and place-names studies, as well as an international comparative approach, we can reconstruct how these kingdoms changed over time.

Paper -c:
Layered kingship is representative of kingly status at varying levels in early Anglo-Saxon England, the period from the English settlement in Britain to the First Viking Age. It relates to the presence and function of locally determined kingship within the culture-zone in question. There has been a tendency, since the start of the 20th century, to focus on big government, with most recent work suggesting that the establishment of the large machine of government was inevitable. This paper will adopt an interdisciplinary approach which is fundamental to my ability to challenge received wisdom.