Skip to main content

IMC 2011: Sessions

Session 1625: Monastic Memorial Culture in the Anglo-Norman World, c. 1050-1150

Thursday 14 July 2011, 11.15-12.45

Sponsor:Department of History, Durham University
Organiser:Charlie Rozier, Durham University Institute for Medieval and Early Modern Studies
Moderator/Chair:Björn Weiler, Department of History & Welsh History, Aberystwyth University
Paper 1625-aDeveloping Commemorative Traditions: The Example of Durham in the Early 12th Century
(Language: English)
Lynda Rollason, Department of History, Durham University
Index terms: Ecclesiastical History, Liturgy, Manuscripts and Palaeography, Monasticism
Paper 1625-bLiturgy, Theology, and the Writing of History: Eadmer's Treatise on the Immaculate Conception
(Language: English)
Kati Ihnat, Department of History, Queen Mary, University of London
Index terms: Biblical Studies, Liturgy, Teaching the Middle Ages, Theology
Paper 1625-cAnselm Teaches, Guibert Remembers: Reflections of Anselm's Teaching in Guibert of Nogent's Memoirs
(Language: English)
Sally N. Vaughn, Department of History, University of Houston, Texas
Index terms: Ecclesiastical History, Monasticism, Teaching the Middle Ages, Technology
Paper 1625-dSt Wulfstan's Courtly Memories
(Language: English)
Thomas O'Donnell, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of York
Index terms: Historiography - Medieval, Language and Literature - Old English, Liturgy, Monasticism
Abstract

This session will explore some of the ways in which memorial culture influenced Anglo-Norman monastic life, from daily remembrance of past monks and benefactors, collection and maintenance of historical and administrative texts, and a devotional way of life built upon the search for and interpretation of higher truths within a sacred historical narrative. The session will consider the methods by which monastic memory was obtained and preserved and its impact, with analyses of monastic administrative processes, spiritual dimensions behind memorial processes, development of confraternity agreements between houses, notions of corporate identity, and via influences and legacies within biblical studies, to consider the relative 'richness' or 'poverty' of memorial culture.