Skip to main content

IMC 2022: Sessions

Session 1728: Borders and Transgression in Late Medieval Southeast Europe

Thursday 7 July 2022, 14.15-15.45

Sponsor:Centre for the Study of the Balkans, Goldsmiths, University of London
Organiser:Nada Zečević, Department of History, Royal Holloway, University of London / Marie Sklodowska Curie Action Project
Moderator/Chair:Kosana Jovanović, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Rijeka
Paper 1728-aBeatrice of Aragon and the Borders of Her Realms: How Transylvania Reached the Danube in 1480
(Language: English)
Alexandru Simon, Center for Transylvanian Studies, Romanian Academy of Sciences, Cluj-Napoca
Index terms: Genealogy and Prosopography, Local History, Politics and Diplomacy, Social History
Paper 1728-bMoving the Borders on a Bigger or Smaller Scale: Agency of Slavonian Nobility in the 15th Century
(Language: English)
Suzana Miljan, Institute of Historical & Social Sciences, Croatian Academy of Sciences & Arts, Zagreb
Index terms: Administration, Charters and Diplomatics, Local History, Politics and Diplomacy
Paper 1728-cThe Good Guys and the Bad Guys?: Banditry in Albania Veneta in the 15th Century
(Language: English)
Nada Zečević, Department of History, Royal Holloway, University of London / Marie Sklodowska Curie Action Project
Index terms: Administration, Daily Life, Law, Mentalities
Abstract

For more than two millennia, Southeast Europe (SEE) has represented a border line between Europe's East and West. Initially instituted as a line dividing the Roman Empire (formalised by Emperor Theodosius I, 379-395), the region's bordering feature remained embedded in the continent's political, religious, ethnic, and cultural delineations, leaving a distinctive mark even on the area's outlook today. To the historical polities that developed there, the border character of SEE brought substantial and long-term change. Resulting from diverse interests of various, often clashing political factors, during the late Middle Ages these polities were involved in frequent direct conflicts, while their stability was additionally challenged by some less apparent, 'mediated' transgressions. Aiming at exploring the role and the significance which these transgressions had in balancing power in the region, this session will focus on three situations in which their key actors - people coming from different ethnic, social, and cultural milieus - challenged the area's 'formal' governing structures, their organisational settings, and their key ideologies. A particular attention will be put on the devices and strategies by which these transgressions were justified in order to manipulate and legitimise some new forms of subversion, submission, and control.