IMC 2024: Sessions
Session 1149: (Sub)Rulerships and Crisis, I: Dynasty and Succession
Wednesday 3 July 2024, 11:15-12:45
Sponsor: | North West Medieval Studies Network (NWMS) |
---|---|
Organisers: | Eddie Meehan, Department of History, University of Liverpool Jonathan Tickle, Department of History, University of Manchester |
Moderator/Chair: | Lindy Brady, Department of History, Geography & Social Sciences, Edge Hill University |
Paper 1149-a | Mobilising subregnum in 9th- to 10th-Century Wessex: Succession, Rebellion, Crisis (Language: English) Index terms: Charters and Diplomatics and Politics and Diplomacy |
Paper 1149-b | Queen Irmingarde of Aquitaine and Carolingian (Sub)Queenship (Language: English) Index terms: Political Thought, Politics and Diplomacy and Rhetoric |
Paper 1149-c | From Governors to Caliphs: Succession Patterns in the Third Fitna, 744-754 (Language: English) Index terms: Genealogy and Prosopography and Islamic and Arabic Studies |
Abstract | These panels compare collegiate and multiple rulerships in all their forms. In this panel, speakers explore a range of rulerships from medieval Europe and the Islamic world, questioning how these are defined and how they reflect broader political culture. Jonathan Tickle explores the continued existence of sub-kingship and regional political communities within the emergent tenth-century English kingdom, and how conceptualisations of sub-rulership were mobilised during times of crisis or contestation. Eddie Meehan looks at the political discourses of the Carolingian rebellions of the early 830s and how these reflect Carolingian political culture and sub-rulership. Finally, Leone Pecorini-Goodall studies Umayyad governors and succession in the third fitna (744-54), using a prospographical approach to understand how barriers to caliphal succession fluctuated. These papers offer comparative perspectives on the nature of sub-rulership in the early medieval world, namely through an exploration of the distinct experiences of multiple authorities in England, the Carolingian empire, the Umayyad caliphate and Wales. In so doing, they question how individual historiographies have approached sub-rulership, and ask what can be learnt from further dialogue between scholars. |