Skip to main content

IMC 2026: Sessions

Session 1709: Charting Female Property and Patrimonial Rights in Law and Practice, III: France and the German-Speaking Areas, 12th-15th Centuries

Thursday 9 July 2026, 14:15-15:45

Sponsor:ERC Consolidator Grant 'Charting Female Property and Patrimonial Rights in Law and Practice across Western Europe, 12th-16th Centuries (PatriFem - 101126116)
Organiser:Denise Bezzina, Dafist - Dipartimento di Antichità, Filosofia e Storia, Università di Genova
Moderator/Chair:Serena Galasso, Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche, Geografiche e dell'Antichità (DISSGeA), Università degli Studi di Padova
Paper 1709-aFinding the Norm: Challenges in Reconstructing Female Property and Patrimonial Rights in Late Medieval Cologne
(Language: English)
Edward Loss, Dafist - Dipartimento di Antichità, Filosofia e Storia, Università di Genova
Index terms: Gender Studies, Law, Social History
Paper 1709-bBetween Statutes, Custom, and Reality: Women's Property Rights in Southern France and the German-Speaking Areas, 13th-16th Centuries
(Language: English)
Verena Weller, Dipartimento di Antichità Filosofia e Storia, Università degli Studi di Genova
Index terms: Daily Life, Gender Studies, Law, Social History
Paper 1709-cWomen's Property Rights in Northern France: From Custom to Written Law, 13th-15th Centuries
(Language: English)
Elena Maccioni, Dafist - Dipartimento di Antichità, Filosofia e Storia, Università di Genova
Index terms: Gender Studies, Law, Social History
Abstract

In exploring the changes in female and property and patrimonial rights France and the German-speaking areas provide for an interesting comparison due to the different legal traditions at the basis of normative changes: while in France one can distinguish between the southern area where Roman civil law was predominant and the north were customary law prevailed, in the German area the legal landscape was much more fragmented. The panel will explore normative differences, the diversified timelines in which laws were introduced and the extent to which law matched practice.