IMC 2026: Sessions
Session 322: Timeless, Endless, and Limitless in Salzburg, III: Digitisation and Visualisation
Monday 6 July 2026, 16:30-18:00
| Organiser: | Julia Hintersteiner, Mittelhochdeutsche Begriffsdatenbank, Fachbereich Germanistik / Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Mittelalter und Frühneuzeit, Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg |
|---|---|
| Moderator/Chair: | Marlene Ernst, Stadtarchiv Salzburg |
| Paper 322-a | Time Reflected in and through the Wall Paintings of the Hohensalzburg Fortress (Language: English) Index terms: Art History - Decorative Arts, Teaching the Middle Ages |
| Paper 322-b | Museum Management and Cultural Mediation at the Hohensalzburg Fortress as a Mirror of Time (Language: English) Index terms: Local History, Teaching the Middle Ages |
| Paper 322-c | Creating a Virtual Collection: Medieval Manuscripts in the Holdings of the Diocesan Archives of Gurk, Carinthia (Language: English) Index terms: Computing in Medieval Studies, Manuscripts and Palaeography |
| Abstract | The overall session strand focuses on/explores topics dealing with different aspects on perceiving time and timelessness in the city and the region of Salzburg – in this case visual as well as digital examples. Medieval art represents not only ‘points in time’ but also concepts of time. Added to this is the viewer’s time. Medieval art is performative; the image ‘actualises’ biblical events. Temporality here refers to the simultaneity of image and ritual experience. The second paper deals with the mediation of the Middle Ages in the context of museums with different types of media. By digitising manuscripts of the episcopal library and the former provostry of Maria Saal, the Diocesan Archives of Gurk aim to make this unique source accessible to researchers and private individuals alike. This will be discussed in the third paper. The fourth paper examines how the Wenzelsbibel digital edition uses TEI, IIIF, and AI-based models to analyze medieval text–image temporalities, highlighting tensions between algorithmic reduction and scholarly interpretation. It bridges medieval art history with current debates on temporality and multimodality in Digital Humanities. |
